There is no substitute for a culture of integrity in organizations. Compliance alone with the law is not enough. History shows that those who make a practice of skating close to the edge always wind up going over the line. A higher bar of ethics performance is necessary. That bar needs to be set and monitored in the boardroom.  ~J. Richard Finlay writing in The Globe and Mail.

Sound governance is not some abstract ideal or utopian pipe dream. Nor does it occur by accident or through sudden outbreaks of altruism. It happens when leaders lead with integrity, when directors actually direct and when stakeholders demand the highest level of ethics and accountability.  ~ J. Richard Finlay in testimony before the Standing Committee on Banking, Commerce and the Economy, Senate of Canada.

The Finlay Centre for Corporate & Public Governance is the longest continuously cited voice on modern governance standards. Our work over the course of four decades helped to build the new paradigm of ethics and accountability by which many corporations and public institutions are judged today.

The Finlay Centre was founded by J. Richard Finlay, one of the world’s most prescient voices for sound boardroom practices, sanity in CEO pay and the ethical responsibilities of trusted leaders. He coined the term stakeholder capitalism in the 1980s.

We pioneered the attributes of environmental responsibility, social purposefulness and successful governance decades before the arrival of ESG. Today we are trying to rebuild the trust that many dubious ESG practices have shattered. 

 

We were the first to predict seismic boardroom flashpoints and downfalls and played key roles in regulatory milestones and reforms.

We’re working to advance the agenda of the new boardroom and public institution of today: diversity at the table; ethics that shine through a culture of integrity; the next chapter in stakeholder capitalism; and leadership that stands as an unrelenting champion for all stakeholders.

Our landmark work in creating what we called a culture of integrity and the ethical practices of trusted organizations has been praised, recognized and replicated around the world.

 

Our rich institutional memory, combined with a record of innovative thinking for tomorrow’s challenges, provide umatached resources to corporate and public sector players.

Trust is the asset that is unseen until it is shattered.  When crisis hits, we know a thing or two about how to rebuild trust— especially in turbulent times.

We’re still one of the world’s most recognized voices on CEO pay and the role of boards as compensation credibility gatekeepers. Somebody has to be.

If this is the cost of saving a company that they claim is too big to fail, maybe the alternative should be explored.

Loss for Q4 2008 $61.66 billion
Loss for FY 2008 $99.3 billion or $37.84 a share (for shares that are trading at
$0.48)
Cost of three previous federal bailouts $150 billion
Cost of fourth bailout today $ 30 billion
Loans and credits from the Federal Reserve System $34.5 billion
Total loans, investments and Fed commitments $214.5 billion

It is said this is being done because AIG is too big to fail.  It was widely held that the Titanic was too big to sink. At least it had the courtesy to hit the iceberg just once, and not repeatedly as this monstrosity of a financial institution is doing.

Edward M. Liddy, AIG’s CEO, could not assure CNBC today that this would be the last of the bailouts, nor could he indicate what AIG will look like when this is all over.
A couple of hundred billion or so is a lot to spend on vagueness, uncertainty and a vision that could just as well be expressed by any number of Wall Street-area taxi drivers.

If this is the cost of saving a company that they claim is too big to fail, maybe the alternative should be explored.